Do you suppose here should be a factor to abortion rights ?
Allthough I am pro-life i'm not anti-abortion and think abortion rights are important for many reason, but I won't go into that.
I saw this question http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?…
the question be asked by someone who I think was a troll but they brought up something that makes most nation angry, her "friend" had 5 abortions
do you think there should be a factor as to how many abortions a woman can have? Do you think nearby should be a limit to abortion right s to prevent the use of abortion as birth control?
(I will give my opinion an a few but I want to hear what you adjectives think first.)
well I individually think abortions should be illegal and are murder, I respect your rights, but YES if you must have one I focus you should only be able to do it once! Cause 5 times?! That's just ridiculous! There is such a piece as BC!
I don't believe abortion should a right period. Unless at hand is a medical condition that puts the mother and baby in *life threatening* danger and you cannot put aside both, then I don't believe in abortion "rights".
Even in the suitcase of rape we have Plan B, so abortion due to rape isn't even a plausible case any longer.
My question is this: Who stands up for the baby's rights?
Even if the little one is an immature human life, it is a human life none the smaller number and deserves to be protected. We protect foreskin rights, we protect animals' rights, we protect gays' rights, but not the rights of the unborn? How did that happen?
I don't mind the legions of thumbs down I'm sure to get here. I stand up for what is right even if it angers others to hear it. Source(s): I will never view abortion as a right. It's not only just "your body your choice". That unborn child deserves a choice. I don't believe it's right to make the choice for the baby just because you are bigger and more powerful.
Answers: LOL. Do you remember that question I asked a long time ago about equal thing? You were one of the people who answered it, and roughly 70 other people answered it telling me that they hoped I died and I should drink Drain-O.
Actually, I did have a friend who have 4 of them. Two of them were within months of each other. I do infer that is abusing the right. However, how do you pass law to keep people from doing this? You can't without infringing on a woman's rights.
Other than that, you freshly have to face up to facts that some people are irresponsible idiots. If they don't own a problem with it, it's not up to us to judge them. And if you believe in God (I don't), your God will mediate them in the end, as is his right.
I think it should be limited to medical emergencies that would eradicate the mother if the pregnancy continued, like ectopic pregnancies. Otherwise I think the innocent baby should be allowed to live, if the parent cannot afford or doesn't want the child after adoption is best.
The first answerer who said there should be a limit. I only agree to a indisputable point, if you can afford kids you should have as many as you want. If you can't afford it (say you are on welfare) you shouldn't have one kid consent to alone more.
I feel that woman should have a right to choose. If they didnt we would have more woman out within giving birth and leaving a baby in some ally to die next to no hope or chance because they did not want it and were too stupid to put it up for adoption. But a limit would probley be worthy also and there should be a limit on how many kids you can hold on welfare theres girls 25 yrs old with 5 and 6 kids with diffrent daddys and they dont enjoy there tubes tied or bc so something needs to happen.
I know this because a clan member of mine has a bunch of kids and even though I spoke to her about the surgery she fail to listen.
Yes,
After someone has had 2 abortions-they should be sterilised.
They are noticeably not capable of using contraception,they have had their likelihood,now take away the option.
I know that it seem a bit harsh,but some of these "women" should not be allowed to make their own decisions.
Men who discard to look after any children that they father, should also be sterilised.
That question has been delete now so I can't see it. But I must admit, I do get furious when I hear of population having had a string of abortions (assuming the abortions weren't all for medical reasons). But no, I don't contemplate there should be a limit to the number allowed. Because no matter where on earth you put the limit, whether it's one or three or ten, problems are always going to arise.
Firstly, in a sick path this may even encourage promiscuity - "Oh I've still got three abortions left so it's cool if it happens". Perhaps not for copious, but I can see some women out there coming up with than line of reasoning - near being a limit puts it into people's minds more.
But more importantly, what if someone has have their, for example, 3 abortion allowance, and is forced by law to keep any future babies, afterwards they fall pregnant again and are told that they have a condition which would kill them if they remain pregnant?
I ponder, considering the human rights issue, if they were going to ban abortions after a certain restriction, they may as well ban abortion all together. And I don't suppose that would be a good thing, either. I'm instinctively wholeheartedly against convenience abortions. If there's some medical reason behind it, or if the woman has be raped, or similar circumstances, then I have no issue. It makes me deeply sad even in those cases, but I can completely see the reasoning. But women who have an abortion as opposing an adoption just because they don't want whatever mental stress is associated with the little one and giving it away, I can't stand it, it shouldn't be about the woman's rights alone once there is a baby inside her - that's my vista anyway, we're all entitled to them and I don't persecute others for different beliefs. But I still don't think it should be illegal for anybody. The number of suicides, backstreet abortions, and cases of child swearing would soar if abortion was banned. And I can see an "all but medical reasons" prevention almost working, but what about the rape victims? But you could never ban "all but rape and medical" - because afterwards how many millions of false rape accusations would there be? So sombrely, I think it should remain the way it is, although I would like to see the consideration brought down by a LOT - here in the UK it is 24 weeks and this makes me physically sick.
honestly i think abortions should be illegal unless you were raped. if your only just out having sex and got pregnant thats your fault and you should enjoy to deal with the consequences. rape victims however yes its still wrong as theres adoption, should have the right especially depending on age but anyone else that newly wants one based on their stupidity should not be allowed.
I believe Abortions should be illegal and doctors that preform them should be charged with murder and the mother's, if you can call them that, that enjoy them should be charged with First degree murder, because abortion is just that premeditated murder.
axiom a woman has a right to have an abortion is like maxim a woman has a right to murder.
I think abortion should only steal place if the mother is at risk of dying of if the father of the child is already married to someone else no one wants a love child, you know what I mean?
People like that make me sick to my stomach. I am pro choice but not pro abortion. An abortion is not something that a sane soul goes into lightly. Are there nut job out there that abuse it, of course but it is not the majority of women.
In answer to your press I would have to say no I do not think at hand should be a limit. The reason I think this is that in attendance needs to be options for women for cases we just do not anticipate. Say we put a parameter on abortion and say a child is a victim of incest numerous occasions. There are flaws within our system and that is why we must always have the choice.
EDIT - I own to say this because of the posts. I am probably going to start a war but I feel the requirement to speak up. So many people have posted that just in cases of rape or immediate risk to the mother's health. One even said the "innocent toddler should be allowed to live". Not all abortions are performed because the baby is on form and unwanted. There are women out there that their baby was deliver a death sentence once outside the womb and a choice had to be made. Abort or watch your toddler die slowly once born. Not all pregnancies result in a happy climax and the reason abortion should be legal is so there are option for women who are facing the unthinkable.
that be my question
do all of you that say in that should be a limit to abortion rights think it is better for the poor girl to have 5 children that she can't elevate because she is a college student who is trying to make more of her life then most of you?
I think within should be mandatory intensive counseling following each abortion a person has to assistance prevent the person from having to make that finding again in the future. Unfortunately there is a moment ago no practical way to impose a law cap the number, there are so many situations out there.
It sure sounds approaching a very bad form of birth control to have that copious abortions. I guess it would be even worse though to bring a child into the world that was unwanted to a mother that was unfit.
Some women seem to use abortion as a form of contraception and that makes me feel it should be cap at about 3. Saying that however, if a woman is refused an abortion and goes onto hold the baby what kind of life are we forcing on the poor piece. The mother may be into drugs or drink and it could be abused or neglected. I couldn't have that on my conscience
No. I'll tell you what your question makes me have a sneaking suspicion that of, though.
Should there be a limit on how many kids a personage can have?
I think YES.
No!..although 5 abortions is ridiculous.
Instead I reflect it should be a mandatory for the Doctor to refer the patient of several abortion to some type of mental hospital...She clearly needs some type of professional help!
No I do not come up with there should be a limit but I do think here should be a requirement that each women having an abortion should go to some sensitive of counseling
I don't consider abortions are used as birth control. I stand behind choice. Too many abortions will destroy your inside anyway, solving any adjectives problems.
Reading some of the answers I see one who thinks abortions should be limited to those who have be raped. I can tell you from personal experience that if a woman has a tubal pregnancy, your tube can be sometimes saved by abort a baby that will abort itself anyway. Doing this can possibly allow the woman to have a baby. People are markedly misinformed..abortions can be for lots of reasons and needed by married women trying to bring a wanted baby into this world...some empire should do their homework.
i don't think nearby should legally be rights to limit but my own personal belief is its ok to get an abortion one time. if you don't swot up your lesson and you get pregnant again, you should have it.
when i was 17 i have an aboriton and afterwords in the recovery room i was puking from the misery killer and a women sitting in there asked me if it be my first one and i nodded yes after i threw up and she said to me "its not so bad after your 2nd or 3rd time" i literally wanted to vomit right contained by that women's lap. i got up as soon as she said that and walked out. and i swear if i feel the urge to vomit when i was walking past that b*tch i would have puked directly onto her.
Obviously there are going to be people in the world who are going to miss use anything entity, just look at Micheal Jackson. Just because he had so many snout jobs does not mean that we should make them ilegal or aim them. I guess abortion is the same thing too many citizens abuse it, true but I don't think those people should be parents any. However I would never want anyone to abort I find the practice disgusting.
I'm all for a three strikes and you're out rule. With your third (or better yet, second) abortion, you get a mandatory tube tying at your expense as a lovely departure gift.
*ETA* How do Michael Jackson's nose job even compare to bloodshed a baby? Honestly, that's the most ridiculous comparison I've ever heard. A nose living is an alteration to a body part; an abortion is ending a human life.
I also wholeheartedly agree next to Tex. I hear people talking about the woman's rights (yes, the right of the psycho who can achieve 5 abortions and show no remorse), but who stands up for the baby's rights? Source(s): Abortion is NOT a form of birth control. There is also a name for people who can end 5 human lives and show no remorse - it's call a psychopath.
I think be in a sad state when questions resembling this need to be asked. Here that swishing sound? Thats human society as a whole going straight down the tubes.
Me honestly unless you were raped you shouldn'tt have an abortion PERIOD! There's stuff out there that prevents pregnancy and if ppl are antiquated enough to spread their legs without any caution used...than they entail to accept responsibility!
Finally someone else who can see that the complete "Pro-Live" vs. "Pro-Choice" are not mutually exclusive. I also believe in "Pro-Live" and "Pro-Choice". However, I also look at the quality of life. To blindly state adjectives life is sacred is BS. I was the one who told the doctors that to my elucidation the quality of life that they could maintain for my father be not what I believed my father would want. If they had kept him alive he would of just been a vegetable, so contained by part I killed my father by telling them to not let go his body. I can say it would of been financially draining on my mother, it was not a "tangible life" or some other bs, but in the end it was my verdict to have my father die. I also know that I could be wrong and that my father just might of recovered out of some miracle or that because of his own fear of demise he would want to be kept alive, but I accept my decision, though I don't fully forgive myself. It is we the living, breathing, thinking, talking, singing, crying human beings around everywhere that opt the life and death of others and no one should rob that choice away froms us, because what would be left would only be a whisp of the humanity that would/could of been. Like I said I'm "Pro-Life" and "Pro-Choice" even presently.
Related Questions:
How should I approach this childcare dilemma?
Is it okay for parents to nick kids out of university to gain cheaper holidays?
What do you meditate my 2 yr elderly son did next to my toothbrush?
I saw this question http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?…
the question be asked by someone who I think was a troll but they brought up something that makes most nation angry, her "friend" had 5 abortions
do you think there should be a factor as to how many abortions a woman can have? Do you think nearby should be a limit to abortion right s to prevent the use of abortion as birth control?
(I will give my opinion an a few but I want to hear what you adjectives think first.)
well I individually think abortions should be illegal and are murder, I respect your rights, but YES if you must have one I focus you should only be able to do it once! Cause 5 times?! That's just ridiculous! There is such a piece as BC!
I don't believe abortion should a right period. Unless at hand is a medical condition that puts the mother and baby in *life threatening* danger and you cannot put aside both, then I don't believe in abortion "rights".
Even in the suitcase of rape we have Plan B, so abortion due to rape isn't even a plausible case any longer.
My question is this: Who stands up for the baby's rights?
Even if the little one is an immature human life, it is a human life none the smaller number and deserves to be protected. We protect foreskin rights, we protect animals' rights, we protect gays' rights, but not the rights of the unborn? How did that happen?
I don't mind the legions of thumbs down I'm sure to get here. I stand up for what is right even if it angers others to hear it. Source(s): I will never view abortion as a right. It's not only just "your body your choice". That unborn child deserves a choice. I don't believe it's right to make the choice for the baby just because you are bigger and more powerful.
Answers: LOL. Do you remember that question I asked a long time ago about equal thing? You were one of the people who answered it, and roughly 70 other people answered it telling me that they hoped I died and I should drink Drain-O.
Actually, I did have a friend who have 4 of them. Two of them were within months of each other. I do infer that is abusing the right. However, how do you pass law to keep people from doing this? You can't without infringing on a woman's rights.
Other than that, you freshly have to face up to facts that some people are irresponsible idiots. If they don't own a problem with it, it's not up to us to judge them. And if you believe in God (I don't), your God will mediate them in the end, as is his right.
I think it should be limited to medical emergencies that would eradicate the mother if the pregnancy continued, like ectopic pregnancies. Otherwise I think the innocent baby should be allowed to live, if the parent cannot afford or doesn't want the child after adoption is best.
The first answerer who said there should be a limit. I only agree to a indisputable point, if you can afford kids you should have as many as you want. If you can't afford it (say you are on welfare) you shouldn't have one kid consent to alone more.
I feel that woman should have a right to choose. If they didnt we would have more woman out within giving birth and leaving a baby in some ally to die next to no hope or chance because they did not want it and were too stupid to put it up for adoption. But a limit would probley be worthy also and there should be a limit on how many kids you can hold on welfare theres girls 25 yrs old with 5 and 6 kids with diffrent daddys and they dont enjoy there tubes tied or bc so something needs to happen.
I know this because a clan member of mine has a bunch of kids and even though I spoke to her about the surgery she fail to listen.
Yes,
After someone has had 2 abortions-they should be sterilised.
They are noticeably not capable of using contraception,they have had their likelihood,now take away the option.
I know that it seem a bit harsh,but some of these "women" should not be allowed to make their own decisions.
Men who discard to look after any children that they father, should also be sterilised.
That question has been delete now so I can't see it. But I must admit, I do get furious when I hear of population having had a string of abortions (assuming the abortions weren't all for medical reasons). But no, I don't contemplate there should be a limit to the number allowed. Because no matter where on earth you put the limit, whether it's one or three or ten, problems are always going to arise.
Firstly, in a sick path this may even encourage promiscuity - "Oh I've still got three abortions left so it's cool if it happens". Perhaps not for copious, but I can see some women out there coming up with than line of reasoning - near being a limit puts it into people's minds more.
But more importantly, what if someone has have their, for example, 3 abortion allowance, and is forced by law to keep any future babies, afterwards they fall pregnant again and are told that they have a condition which would kill them if they remain pregnant?
I ponder, considering the human rights issue, if they were going to ban abortions after a certain restriction, they may as well ban abortion all together. And I don't suppose that would be a good thing, either. I'm instinctively wholeheartedly against convenience abortions. If there's some medical reason behind it, or if the woman has be raped, or similar circumstances, then I have no issue. It makes me deeply sad even in those cases, but I can completely see the reasoning. But women who have an abortion as opposing an adoption just because they don't want whatever mental stress is associated with the little one and giving it away, I can't stand it, it shouldn't be about the woman's rights alone once there is a baby inside her - that's my vista anyway, we're all entitled to them and I don't persecute others for different beliefs. But I still don't think it should be illegal for anybody. The number of suicides, backstreet abortions, and cases of child swearing would soar if abortion was banned. And I can see an "all but medical reasons" prevention almost working, but what about the rape victims? But you could never ban "all but rape and medical" - because afterwards how many millions of false rape accusations would there be? So sombrely, I think it should remain the way it is, although I would like to see the consideration brought down by a LOT - here in the UK it is 24 weeks and this makes me physically sick.
honestly i think abortions should be illegal unless you were raped. if your only just out having sex and got pregnant thats your fault and you should enjoy to deal with the consequences. rape victims however yes its still wrong as theres adoption, should have the right especially depending on age but anyone else that newly wants one based on their stupidity should not be allowed.
I believe Abortions should be illegal and doctors that preform them should be charged with murder and the mother's, if you can call them that, that enjoy them should be charged with First degree murder, because abortion is just that premeditated murder.
axiom a woman has a right to have an abortion is like maxim a woman has a right to murder.
I think abortion should only steal place if the mother is at risk of dying of if the father of the child is already married to someone else no one wants a love child, you know what I mean?
People like that make me sick to my stomach. I am pro choice but not pro abortion. An abortion is not something that a sane soul goes into lightly. Are there nut job out there that abuse it, of course but it is not the majority of women.
In answer to your press I would have to say no I do not think at hand should be a limit. The reason I think this is that in attendance needs to be options for women for cases we just do not anticipate. Say we put a parameter on abortion and say a child is a victim of incest numerous occasions. There are flaws within our system and that is why we must always have the choice.
EDIT - I own to say this because of the posts. I am probably going to start a war but I feel the requirement to speak up. So many people have posted that just in cases of rape or immediate risk to the mother's health. One even said the "innocent toddler should be allowed to live". Not all abortions are performed because the baby is on form and unwanted. There are women out there that their baby was deliver a death sentence once outside the womb and a choice had to be made. Abort or watch your toddler die slowly once born. Not all pregnancies result in a happy climax and the reason abortion should be legal is so there are option for women who are facing the unthinkable.
that be my question
do all of you that say in that should be a limit to abortion rights think it is better for the poor girl to have 5 children that she can't elevate because she is a college student who is trying to make more of her life then most of you?
I think within should be mandatory intensive counseling following each abortion a person has to assistance prevent the person from having to make that finding again in the future. Unfortunately there is a moment ago no practical way to impose a law cap the number, there are so many situations out there.
It sure sounds approaching a very bad form of birth control to have that copious abortions. I guess it would be even worse though to bring a child into the world that was unwanted to a mother that was unfit.
Some women seem to use abortion as a form of contraception and that makes me feel it should be cap at about 3. Saying that however, if a woman is refused an abortion and goes onto hold the baby what kind of life are we forcing on the poor piece. The mother may be into drugs or drink and it could be abused or neglected. I couldn't have that on my conscience
No. I'll tell you what your question makes me have a sneaking suspicion that of, though.
Should there be a limit on how many kids a personage can have?
I think YES.
No!..although 5 abortions is ridiculous.
Instead I reflect it should be a mandatory for the Doctor to refer the patient of several abortion to some type of mental hospital...She clearly needs some type of professional help!
No I do not come up with there should be a limit but I do think here should be a requirement that each women having an abortion should go to some sensitive of counseling
I don't consider abortions are used as birth control. I stand behind choice. Too many abortions will destroy your inside anyway, solving any adjectives problems.
Reading some of the answers I see one who thinks abortions should be limited to those who have be raped. I can tell you from personal experience that if a woman has a tubal pregnancy, your tube can be sometimes saved by abort a baby that will abort itself anyway. Doing this can possibly allow the woman to have a baby. People are markedly misinformed..abortions can be for lots of reasons and needed by married women trying to bring a wanted baby into this world...some empire should do their homework.
i don't think nearby should legally be rights to limit but my own personal belief is its ok to get an abortion one time. if you don't swot up your lesson and you get pregnant again, you should have it.
when i was 17 i have an aboriton and afterwords in the recovery room i was puking from the misery killer and a women sitting in there asked me if it be my first one and i nodded yes after i threw up and she said to me "its not so bad after your 2nd or 3rd time" i literally wanted to vomit right contained by that women's lap. i got up as soon as she said that and walked out. and i swear if i feel the urge to vomit when i was walking past that b*tch i would have puked directly onto her.
Obviously there are going to be people in the world who are going to miss use anything entity, just look at Micheal Jackson. Just because he had so many snout jobs does not mean that we should make them ilegal or aim them. I guess abortion is the same thing too many citizens abuse it, true but I don't think those people should be parents any. However I would never want anyone to abort I find the practice disgusting.
I'm all for a three strikes and you're out rule. With your third (or better yet, second) abortion, you get a mandatory tube tying at your expense as a lovely departure gift.
*ETA* How do Michael Jackson's nose job even compare to bloodshed a baby? Honestly, that's the most ridiculous comparison I've ever heard. A nose living is an alteration to a body part; an abortion is ending a human life.
I also wholeheartedly agree next to Tex. I hear people talking about the woman's rights (yes, the right of the psycho who can achieve 5 abortions and show no remorse), but who stands up for the baby's rights? Source(s): Abortion is NOT a form of birth control. There is also a name for people who can end 5 human lives and show no remorse - it's call a psychopath.
I think be in a sad state when questions resembling this need to be asked. Here that swishing sound? Thats human society as a whole going straight down the tubes.
Me honestly unless you were raped you shouldn'tt have an abortion PERIOD! There's stuff out there that prevents pregnancy and if ppl are antiquated enough to spread their legs without any caution used...than they entail to accept responsibility!
Finally someone else who can see that the complete "Pro-Live" vs. "Pro-Choice" are not mutually exclusive. I also believe in "Pro-Live" and "Pro-Choice". However, I also look at the quality of life. To blindly state adjectives life is sacred is BS. I was the one who told the doctors that to my elucidation the quality of life that they could maintain for my father be not what I believed my father would want. If they had kept him alive he would of just been a vegetable, so contained by part I killed my father by telling them to not let go his body. I can say it would of been financially draining on my mother, it was not a "tangible life" or some other bs, but in the end it was my verdict to have my father die. I also know that I could be wrong and that my father just might of recovered out of some miracle or that because of his own fear of demise he would want to be kept alive, but I accept my decision, though I don't fully forgive myself. It is we the living, breathing, thinking, talking, singing, crying human beings around everywhere that opt the life and death of others and no one should rob that choice away froms us, because what would be left would only be a whisp of the humanity that would/could of been. Like I said I'm "Pro-Life" and "Pro-Choice" even presently.
Related Questions: