How various is too copious?
i want to have a lot of kids i wont say how plentiful bacause everyone will think i am mental...but how many is too many?
LOL linger till you push your first one out, and then see how many more you want to go through adjectives that pain for. Get a life, I don't want my tax dollars paying for your kids welfare.
as many as you can emotionally, physically, and financially manage to pop out and deal beside.
There's no right or wrong here. Ppl only have an issue with super-breeders if they quality like the kids are getting a raw deal beside it all.
don't forget to take into account your own physical strength. Having a baby is a monumental effort.
Answers: 8 kids Source(s): 7 on the process!
do you want 8 to 12 kids or something? some people
love having oodles kids and i most cases, it is possible
but it may not be too healthy for your body.
i would say, for me, 4 would be the limit, but contained by general,
i think 7-9 is a good constrict. come on, tell us how many
kids you want, we won't judge you.
everyone is different when it comes to opinion and options.
if it's atleast under 10, i think its okay but over to be precise just
extraordinary but i could see it happening.
4 or 5. 6 or more is to many Source(s): Mommie of one
in good health ask yourself truthful how many can you afford.
If you can only afford 2 then 4 is too frequent, also ask yourself could you deal with 5 little ones running around causing turmoil
for me personally, i think 7+ is too many, some mums on here can do it but 6 is the factor, financially + emotionally, also we currently only have 3 children, financially we're fine but the oldest is 10 and the twins are 10months we want at least 3 year between the twins + #4 because i couldn't cope near 3 under 3's, but then if i want to space it out well, i don't want more later 15years between Kaila and the youngest
have one, see how you go, if you want another one then hold another one, keep going you'll no your limit!
i would say 6 or 7 is getting to the target
Well, in my personal opion too abundant is over 4. I think 4 is okay. If you have four you can space them out nicely and will not other be pregnant. You have to consider everything. Space, cost, childcare, and enough attention for each child.
I would say as many as you can afford to support financially. My husband and I agreed 3 be the limit but then I fell pregnant with number 4! We will plainly be stopping after this one!
Only own as many that you can financial support! This is how America gets poor and breeds criminals - people own more kids than they can support and it gets crazy.
I think it become too many when you can't properly care for them (financially, mentally, emotionally, etc.)
If you can afford them, and give them proper/enough love, attention and guidance, afterwards keep them coming - whether it be 2, 5, 10 or 20 (or more).
If you have three chilren and your 15 year old is pregnant, your 13 year older has been caught drinking with friends and your 10 year antiquated is rude and disrespectful, then stop. Three is enough!
But if you have 19 and they are adjectives polite, modest, respectful, mannerly, etc. then go for baby #20!
What one person considers too many may be perfect for another! Too tons kids is when you get the point where you are unable to guardianship and provide for all of them properly
I think it is wrong to bring children into the world if you do not own the means to support them and give them all the probability in life which they deserve. It is also wrong to expect other people i.e. relatives, friends etc to bail you out near expenses, and the more money you claim from the "state" increases other people's tax burdens, so while you may long for a large family, I urge you to infer long and hard about just how various children you can comfortably afford to keep.
You can have as much as you want (if you can touch it), but I'd wouldn't have more than five.
I personally think 5 is adequate. I dont think kids like the Duggars get a unadulterated bond with their parents when theres 20 of them or whatever.
if you can afford a large family connections, then go for it. personally I assume 3 is the limit.
One is enough for me.
I know a people that has 8 kids and one more on the way. I focus that's crazy. But it's not my family. They make enough money to support them. The mom stays home and home school them. I could never do it. But some people are made to do it. If you can financially and mentally handle 100 kids then dance for it. I'll stick with my one and be happy.
OK , so three kids is so good , from let say 5 is 2 many !!
6 is too many
Do you honestly care what people think of you??
You're the one raise the Children, not them...
Related Questions:
What to do lacking the minute?
Did you discuss children until that time getting married or otherwise committing to a relationship?
Pampers Gifts To Grow Codes?
LOL linger till you push your first one out, and then see how many more you want to go through adjectives that pain for. Get a life, I don't want my tax dollars paying for your kids welfare.
as many as you can emotionally, physically, and financially manage to pop out and deal beside.
There's no right or wrong here. Ppl only have an issue with super-breeders if they quality like the kids are getting a raw deal beside it all.
don't forget to take into account your own physical strength. Having a baby is a monumental effort.
Answers: 8 kids Source(s): 7 on the process!
do you want 8 to 12 kids or something? some people
love having oodles kids and i most cases, it is possible
but it may not be too healthy for your body.
i would say, for me, 4 would be the limit, but contained by general,
i think 7-9 is a good constrict. come on, tell us how many
kids you want, we won't judge you.
everyone is different when it comes to opinion and options.
if it's atleast under 10, i think its okay but over to be precise just
extraordinary but i could see it happening.
4 or 5. 6 or more is to many Source(s): Mommie of one
in good health ask yourself truthful how many can you afford.
If you can only afford 2 then 4 is too frequent, also ask yourself could you deal with 5 little ones running around causing turmoil
for me personally, i think 7+ is too many, some mums on here can do it but 6 is the factor, financially + emotionally, also we currently only have 3 children, financially we're fine but the oldest is 10 and the twins are 10months we want at least 3 year between the twins + #4 because i couldn't cope near 3 under 3's, but then if i want to space it out well, i don't want more later 15years between Kaila and the youngest
have one, see how you go, if you want another one then hold another one, keep going you'll no your limit!
i would say 6 or 7 is getting to the target
Well, in my personal opion too abundant is over 4. I think 4 is okay. If you have four you can space them out nicely and will not other be pregnant. You have to consider everything. Space, cost, childcare, and enough attention for each child.
I would say as many as you can afford to support financially. My husband and I agreed 3 be the limit but then I fell pregnant with number 4! We will plainly be stopping after this one!
Only own as many that you can financial support! This is how America gets poor and breeds criminals - people own more kids than they can support and it gets crazy.
I think it become too many when you can't properly care for them (financially, mentally, emotionally, etc.)
If you can afford them, and give them proper/enough love, attention and guidance, afterwards keep them coming - whether it be 2, 5, 10 or 20 (or more).
If you have three chilren and your 15 year old is pregnant, your 13 year older has been caught drinking with friends and your 10 year antiquated is rude and disrespectful, then stop. Three is enough!
But if you have 19 and they are adjectives polite, modest, respectful, mannerly, etc. then go for baby #20!
What one person considers too many may be perfect for another! Too tons kids is when you get the point where you are unable to guardianship and provide for all of them properly
I think it is wrong to bring children into the world if you do not own the means to support them and give them all the probability in life which they deserve. It is also wrong to expect other people i.e. relatives, friends etc to bail you out near expenses, and the more money you claim from the "state" increases other people's tax burdens, so while you may long for a large family, I urge you to infer long and hard about just how various children you can comfortably afford to keep.
You can have as much as you want (if you can touch it), but I'd wouldn't have more than five.
I personally think 5 is adequate. I dont think kids like the Duggars get a unadulterated bond with their parents when theres 20 of them or whatever.
if you can afford a large family connections, then go for it. personally I assume 3 is the limit.
One is enough for me.
I know a people that has 8 kids and one more on the way. I focus that's crazy. But it's not my family. They make enough money to support them. The mom stays home and home school them. I could never do it. But some people are made to do it. If you can financially and mentally handle 100 kids then dance for it. I'll stick with my one and be happy.
OK , so three kids is so good , from let say 5 is 2 many !!
6 is too many
Do you honestly care what people think of you??
You're the one raise the Children, not them...
Related Questions: