Apparently my final interview be confusing going on for abortion.?
I'm not asking whether you are pro choice or life...i want to know how you feel about the argot used by some people.
I notice that some pro choice women use terminology that imply that having an abortion SHOULD be a woman's choice because (as they say) "It is her own uterus". I feel that this statement and others like it discount the certainty that it is a life being aborted, not an organ.
I wonder if anyone else see the same thing I do? Do any of the rest of you feel it is in the dark to imply that abortion only effects a woman's uterus?
I am interested in everyone's opinion on this...not just those who agree with me.
You're right. This is the same sort of word games employed by most liberal humanist socialists. It's call "distraction". Anything to avoid the main point. You have seen this strategy used by politicians when asked a simple yes or no ask. They babble on for minutes and never actually answer the question.
Until we can all agree on when life begin there is no point to debating this (as Nina Lee said). We will all come up with different answers.
Abortion have little to do with the uterus and much more to do with ridding it of the cells that are inside of it (the baby). So the suggestion that it is the woman's choice and only effects her is ridiculous.
It goes both ways. Saying pro-life infers that the other side is against life. You can't complain about one and not the other. It should only be for abortion/ against abortion. Forget all the terminology.
I m not sure if this rreally answers your Q, but.. I was a journalism primary in college, and was astonished to learn that according to AP style, the correct argot is "pro-choice." The term "pro-abortion" is not allowed in report stories. YET, the term "pro-life" is also NOT allowed, and the correct terminology is "anti-abortion"
Now, tell me how that make any sense at all. I changed my major.
luvmy4bo... say it perfectly. No need for further comment.
Why did your sound out get deleted? I had a REALLY long answer and later it went away before I could post it. BLAH!
I understand what you're axiom. I'm not going to go all into it b/c I just did that 5 minutes ago and it be all erased. I'll just say that I deduce abortion effects a whole lot more than just a uterus. That is not why I personally touch the woman should have the choice. It has nothing to do next to her organs for me.
A person’s perspective really stems from when a baby become a baby. Some believe it’s at conception. Others believe it’s beyond a certain part of pregnancy. And THAT is the drive people just talk in the order of a woman’s uterus being all that’s affected. Because some race really and truly don’t believe a fertilized egg is anything more than a fertilized egg. Some don’t believe it IS a baby at that point. And that’s a person’s personal belief so it’s not right or wrong.
Because I am pro-choice, because I don’t believe a fertilized egg is anything more than a fertilized egg – I’m okay with a person have an abortion. I don’t believe abortion is a method of birth control. I don’t believe you can say that in situation A they can have one but contained by situation B they cannot. It’s all or nothing in my assessment.
And just to clarify, just because I’m pro-choice, doesn’t mean I’d ever take an abortion. I don’t like abortions but I believe everyone should have a choice if they were put contained by the position to ever have to choose.
It all boils down to...not everyone agrees on when enthusiasm begins.
Lake of Fire is a great documentary if you've never seen it. It can shed light on the others beliefs. It's a honest movie b/c it displays both sides of abortion.
Damn it Carrie my answer was good & you deleted the Q!
I do not believe the "her body her choice" phrase as, approaching you said, not a organ being removed; it's a baby.
i had a good answer all typed out to that cross-examine too. then hit submit and it was deleted. im not sure i can top the sensation that was present in that answer but ill furnish it another go. :-)
okay for me that statement isnt just about the living mortal in her body. yes i understand the baby have a heartbeat right around the time you find out you are pregnant. and yes i consider "it" a baby. however, in my opinion, to dictate what happen inside of a womans body is nobodys business but her own. to say you lady got pregnant presently you must go through pregnancy, childbirth, and then care for this living breathing individual - is not my decision. my body is my own. to have anyone tell me what happen in it is no ones decision but my own. its really the same item as forcing me to have chemo if i dont want it or forcing me to undergo anything i didnt want done to me. yea i understand though the woman does own a child her in body, but like it or not - i can not and should not be the one who says - sorry roughly your luck lady. yea you used BC and condoms and whatever else but you got pregnant anyway enjoy the baby and be a fantastic mother. what if shes not and knows it? what if she already has 3 kids and can afford another mouth to nurture? what if shes a drug addict living on the streets? what if shes someone who was raped? what if anything? its not my body that tot is growing in. if it was i would be a wonderful mother to lots and lots of kids, but thats not happening...
ps - it is within the womans body. if it was in the mans body all right thats another disagreement/discussion. if we dislike the way this whole child coming into the world thing near really is only one person who can change that.
expurgate - she absolutely is aborting a baby. you are correct. thats what happen. i believe that. as i said i believe "it" is a baby. at this point in my life, i cant see in your mind`s eye having an abortion. "i" cant. that i think is my point in adjectives of my rambling. i cant begin to understand every ones circumstances around the world. however, i will utter i dont think abortions are the problem - its unwanted pregnancies. how did those happen? why are they still happening? i read a stat that said the majority of abortions werent done by teens but by immature woman and older woman were equal to teens. what does that say? only just an interesting tidbit.
it's easier to dream up of it as a lump of cells rather than something that will grow into a human being. everyone tip toes around the point to sort their argument more convincing. i am pro-choice, although i personally choose life. i think that within some instances abortion is really the best option. you have to be responsible and ready to bring enthusiasm into the world, otherwise what kind of life will that child have? i know a guy who have a 10 month old and honestly, i see the life that baby have. nothing good will come out of it. neither parents were in position and now that poor child is in the system going from foster family to foster domestic. there ar times when there is a high risk of vigour issues with the baby, or the pregnancy could even be dangerous for the mother. within those instances, i think if both parents can decide on abortion, it is for the better.
You can't miss what you don't know.
Seems smaller quantity cruel to me to abort a fetus than to wreck some poor 16-year-old girl's future educational and workplace opportunities.
Let's feel about this (highly unlikely, but still possible) scenario:
A transboy has been living as a boy for several years very soon. (This means that he was born female, but lives as a boy because he have the brain of a boy.) Somehow, he ends up pregnant, be it through rape, condom breakage, etc. (Yes, some transboys do have intercourse. Transgender people are still allowed to enjoy sex.)
Should this guy be forced to verbs with the pregnancy, even though doing so would completely wreck the image he has worked so unyielding for, and possibly place him at horrible risk of anti-trans violence, all so that one more kid can be added to the overpopulated planet?
What if you individually were raped? Would it be okay to force you to have the kid?
In my opinion "Pro-Choice" because it is "THEIR BODY" is akin to a parent saying since it is "THEIR HOUSE", they should be able to murder their child.
This Pro-Choice, and My Body/Uterus, are adjectives just **** justifications that people enjoy latched onto to get their own way, and avoid responsibility. No one with a friggin' brain can honestly look at any of this **** and come to the conclusion that it's anything but murder.
like Nina lee said, the debate is when does life initiate, and I do not think that will ever be resolved. As far as the terms used, well that go right along with that debate.
I am pro choice, but I do not like the idea of abortion any. I have realized in my 7 years as a social worker that not everything is so black and white, at hand is many sades of gray. I have met many women surrounded by situations that you could possibly never imagine. For them to have a baby, or even fetch one for 9 months would cause them hell that you could never believe. Like you said, a pregnancy does affect more then the women's uterus, it affects her life, and various others around her.
I notice how many pro life individuals want the babies to be born, but do not give a crap to what happens to the child once it is here. If people did at hand would not be over 2 million kids in foster care. People would not constantly complain about their taxes going to wic and other social serives programs that are aimed to poor mothers.
Have you ever been raped? Have you ever had that rape result in a pregnancy? How would you be aware of? Would you be able to carry that baby to possession?
That's not a fun situation to be in. Certainly not a healthy one. Who are you to demand that that rape subject suffer another 9 months on top of what she's already been through?
A friend of mine was raped final year by an acquaintance. A little over a month later, she realized she be pregnant. Considering she was practicing abstinence at the moment, after going through a terribly messy divorce next to her abusive ex-husband, there was beyond a shadow of a doubt as to who the baby belonged to.
Are you telling me that, after having be beaten by her husband, stalked and harassed by him, and finally being competent to break free from him, she should then prepare for another 9 months of hell, on top of what she already suffered by the rape?
I don't believe that abortion should be used as a form of lazy birth control. I do believe, that within are at times, extenuating circumstances that mean tough decisions are called for.
I've never be pro-abortion. But I am pro-choice. I went with her to the clinic. How could I not? After all she have been through, the abuse, the terror, the stalking, the harassing, and the icing on the cake... the rape, within is no way I could stand there and judge her for what she needed to do.
I would hope that you'd enjoy a heart and not do so either.
Edit: No. I didn't miss the point, and I didn't assume. I asked questions that you choose not to answer. I didn't expect that you would. Those are very personal question. I answered your question and explained my reasoning behind it. It's quite simple. I am pro-choice, though I am not pro-abortion. I used to be anti-abortion. But how could I look at her, and communicate her I thought it was best for all involved for her to have that child? Especially, when she have opened my eyes to a circumstance I'd never considered, and there was no opening I could pretend to believe that that would be best for her? What used to be such a cut and dry issue for me, no longer is. I still can't think about abortion without seeing her facade the night she came to me. She made the right choice for her. Whether or not that would have be the right choice for me, in that situation, I can't say. I've never been within that situation. I can't judge her.
In my own situation, I found myself pregnant at 21, due to my own stupidity. I made a stupid choice to not be "safe" and abortion was not an option for me. I figure, my mistake, I'll own up to. My son will turn 13 next week. I don't regret my decision. That was my situation, and my choice.
My friend made matching choice when she was preg at 17. Her son is a sweety, turning 14 this year.
What you have to understand, is in that is more than just a uterus, or a fetus at stake here. Those aren't the only things affected by this judgment. Should that child have been born? If so, should she raise it so that she can look at that child every light of day and relive what happened to her? Or should she give it up for adoption? How would she explain that to the child she already has? How would she explain it 20 yrs down the road when that child have grown and come for answers?
I was trying to answer but it get deleted before I posted but here was my answer.
Personally I dream up the choice to have an abortion is a selfish one. The whole "it's my body" argument is only just selfish to me. It's not all about the pregnant woman, what more or less the life growing inside, what about the father?
I think it's insensitive and find it interesting that many woman who are pro-choice are also the same women who would be all over a man for not taking on his responsibilities as a father and equal parent but at indistinguishable time they wouldn't want him to be able to have an equal say surrounded by whether the baby is aborted or not. They think it's of late the women's choice. It's like they want the father involved but only if it's convenient for them.
I think pro-life pro-choice really have a lot to do with when you believe life begin. For me I believe it begins at conception because unless there is a natural miscarriage, it WILL grow into a living human anyone. So to me by stopping that from happening no matter when during the pregnancy you do, it is like massacre a life.
The ONLY time I can understand someone having an abortion is when at hand is a high risk to the mother's life, especially if she already has children who involve her. If someone has a known condition that would complicate a pregnancy and risk their life afterwards they should be responsible for preventing a pregnancy though.
Answers: This is slightly off the topic of what you be asking, but it's what bugs me the most about the whole "pro-choice" thing. Why is that choice merely given to the mother? Does the father get a say in the toddler that is half his genetics? I hold never understood why the mother gets all or the final ruling just because she goes through the pregnancy- it's nine months compared to a whole duration. What choice does the baby have? Yes people hold different ideas of when life begins, but even if you merely see it as a potential life- why is that life not important enough to present it the chance to live. As to your question- I think they do that to keep it impersonal because it's easier to judge of it as a non-thing than a living, human being. Just like they use the terminology "pro-choice" because it's not nice to focus of it as "pro-death of a baby I find inconvenient".
I agree near you.
The main argument that pro-choicers give is "It's her body, it's her choice". Well what about the child. Don't they win a choice? They are the ones who are going to die when it's all said and done. The mother is going to leave that office and know how to go back to her life. The toddler won't.
Who knows who that baby would have grown up to be? They could enjoy done amazing things. But we'll never know.
I do notice how alot of pro-choicers focus on the issue of 'choice' and 'womens body' they rarely ever refer to it as 'discontinuing the duration of a baby' or 'the baby' at all, instead it's an 'embryo' I suppose it's easier to justify the act individual done.
it's similar to 'collateral damage' referring to innocent life taken by war
I agree with you 100% It is really disappointed that a lot of people ("pro-choice") consider a fetus to be a "lump of cells" rather than a developing child.
Nobody is implying that it is only the uterus effected. Her uterus is contained by her body, the baby is being sustained by body alone. That is her business what she chooses to do with her body. If she have a tumor, it is her choice to do what deems necessary to her. Should we give tumors the right to thrive? Nobody should consistency like they no options when faced next to a crisis. It is her body, it belongs to no one else but her. Whatever is in her body, is taken care of as she see fit. If a woman feels the need to terminate a pregnancy, it is not my place to conciliator. I am very much Pro-Choice, but I don't feel abortion is right for me personally.
Personally I do NOT agree with abortion. From the time the sperm meet the egg there is a life growing inside of you. I think too tons women use abortion as a form of birth control and that is just plain SICK!! If it was up to me I would sort it illegal except in extreme cases ie. rape, incest, etc. I believe in the "you play you pay". That if you are grown plenty to have sex you are old enough to switch any consequences that come from it.
However, I have had friends who have have abortions and I have come to realize that it is each person's right to choose. I think it should NOT be allowed after the first 6 weeks, because by next there is a heart beating and a brain forming and to me that is murder.
Related Questions:
When does it become unusual or akward for a parent to see their disparate sex child exposed?
Why do you moms other resembling to hang on to your kids down?
My mother treats me close to a kid?
I notice that some pro choice women use terminology that imply that having an abortion SHOULD be a woman's choice because (as they say) "It is her own uterus". I feel that this statement and others like it discount the certainty that it is a life being aborted, not an organ.
I wonder if anyone else see the same thing I do? Do any of the rest of you feel it is in the dark to imply that abortion only effects a woman's uterus?
I am interested in everyone's opinion on this...not just those who agree with me.
You're right. This is the same sort of word games employed by most liberal humanist socialists. It's call "distraction". Anything to avoid the main point. You have seen this strategy used by politicians when asked a simple yes or no ask. They babble on for minutes and never actually answer the question.
Until we can all agree on when life begin there is no point to debating this (as Nina Lee said). We will all come up with different answers.
Abortion have little to do with the uterus and much more to do with ridding it of the cells that are inside of it (the baby). So the suggestion that it is the woman's choice and only effects her is ridiculous.
It goes both ways. Saying pro-life infers that the other side is against life. You can't complain about one and not the other. It should only be for abortion/ against abortion. Forget all the terminology.
I m not sure if this rreally answers your Q, but.. I was a journalism primary in college, and was astonished to learn that according to AP style, the correct argot is "pro-choice." The term "pro-abortion" is not allowed in report stories. YET, the term "pro-life" is also NOT allowed, and the correct terminology is "anti-abortion"
Now, tell me how that make any sense at all. I changed my major.
luvmy4bo... say it perfectly. No need for further comment.
Why did your sound out get deleted? I had a REALLY long answer and later it went away before I could post it. BLAH!
I understand what you're axiom. I'm not going to go all into it b/c I just did that 5 minutes ago and it be all erased. I'll just say that I deduce abortion effects a whole lot more than just a uterus. That is not why I personally touch the woman should have the choice. It has nothing to do next to her organs for me.
A person’s perspective really stems from when a baby become a baby. Some believe it’s at conception. Others believe it’s beyond a certain part of pregnancy. And THAT is the drive people just talk in the order of a woman’s uterus being all that’s affected. Because some race really and truly don’t believe a fertilized egg is anything more than a fertilized egg. Some don’t believe it IS a baby at that point. And that’s a person’s personal belief so it’s not right or wrong.
Because I am pro-choice, because I don’t believe a fertilized egg is anything more than a fertilized egg – I’m okay with a person have an abortion. I don’t believe abortion is a method of birth control. I don’t believe you can say that in situation A they can have one but contained by situation B they cannot. It’s all or nothing in my assessment.
And just to clarify, just because I’m pro-choice, doesn’t mean I’d ever take an abortion. I don’t like abortions but I believe everyone should have a choice if they were put contained by the position to ever have to choose.
It all boils down to...not everyone agrees on when enthusiasm begins.
Lake of Fire is a great documentary if you've never seen it. It can shed light on the others beliefs. It's a honest movie b/c it displays both sides of abortion.
Damn it Carrie my answer was good & you deleted the Q!
I do not believe the "her body her choice" phrase as, approaching you said, not a organ being removed; it's a baby.
i had a good answer all typed out to that cross-examine too. then hit submit and it was deleted. im not sure i can top the sensation that was present in that answer but ill furnish it another go. :-)
okay for me that statement isnt just about the living mortal in her body. yes i understand the baby have a heartbeat right around the time you find out you are pregnant. and yes i consider "it" a baby. however, in my opinion, to dictate what happen inside of a womans body is nobodys business but her own. to say you lady got pregnant presently you must go through pregnancy, childbirth, and then care for this living breathing individual - is not my decision. my body is my own. to have anyone tell me what happen in it is no ones decision but my own. its really the same item as forcing me to have chemo if i dont want it or forcing me to undergo anything i didnt want done to me. yea i understand though the woman does own a child her in body, but like it or not - i can not and should not be the one who says - sorry roughly your luck lady. yea you used BC and condoms and whatever else but you got pregnant anyway enjoy the baby and be a fantastic mother. what if shes not and knows it? what if she already has 3 kids and can afford another mouth to nurture? what if shes a drug addict living on the streets? what if shes someone who was raped? what if anything? its not my body that tot is growing in. if it was i would be a wonderful mother to lots and lots of kids, but thats not happening...
ps - it is within the womans body. if it was in the mans body all right thats another disagreement/discussion. if we dislike the way this whole child coming into the world thing near really is only one person who can change that.
expurgate - she absolutely is aborting a baby. you are correct. thats what happen. i believe that. as i said i believe "it" is a baby. at this point in my life, i cant see in your mind`s eye having an abortion. "i" cant. that i think is my point in adjectives of my rambling. i cant begin to understand every ones circumstances around the world. however, i will utter i dont think abortions are the problem - its unwanted pregnancies. how did those happen? why are they still happening? i read a stat that said the majority of abortions werent done by teens but by immature woman and older woman were equal to teens. what does that say? only just an interesting tidbit.
it's easier to dream up of it as a lump of cells rather than something that will grow into a human being. everyone tip toes around the point to sort their argument more convincing. i am pro-choice, although i personally choose life. i think that within some instances abortion is really the best option. you have to be responsible and ready to bring enthusiasm into the world, otherwise what kind of life will that child have? i know a guy who have a 10 month old and honestly, i see the life that baby have. nothing good will come out of it. neither parents were in position and now that poor child is in the system going from foster family to foster domestic. there ar times when there is a high risk of vigour issues with the baby, or the pregnancy could even be dangerous for the mother. within those instances, i think if both parents can decide on abortion, it is for the better.
You can't miss what you don't know.
Seems smaller quantity cruel to me to abort a fetus than to wreck some poor 16-year-old girl's future educational and workplace opportunities.
Let's feel about this (highly unlikely, but still possible) scenario:
A transboy has been living as a boy for several years very soon. (This means that he was born female, but lives as a boy because he have the brain of a boy.) Somehow, he ends up pregnant, be it through rape, condom breakage, etc. (Yes, some transboys do have intercourse. Transgender people are still allowed to enjoy sex.)
Should this guy be forced to verbs with the pregnancy, even though doing so would completely wreck the image he has worked so unyielding for, and possibly place him at horrible risk of anti-trans violence, all so that one more kid can be added to the overpopulated planet?
What if you individually were raped? Would it be okay to force you to have the kid?
In my opinion "Pro-Choice" because it is "THEIR BODY" is akin to a parent saying since it is "THEIR HOUSE", they should be able to murder their child.
This Pro-Choice, and My Body/Uterus, are adjectives just **** justifications that people enjoy latched onto to get their own way, and avoid responsibility. No one with a friggin' brain can honestly look at any of this **** and come to the conclusion that it's anything but murder.
like Nina lee said, the debate is when does life initiate, and I do not think that will ever be resolved. As far as the terms used, well that go right along with that debate.
I am pro choice, but I do not like the idea of abortion any. I have realized in my 7 years as a social worker that not everything is so black and white, at hand is many sades of gray. I have met many women surrounded by situations that you could possibly never imagine. For them to have a baby, or even fetch one for 9 months would cause them hell that you could never believe. Like you said, a pregnancy does affect more then the women's uterus, it affects her life, and various others around her.
I notice how many pro life individuals want the babies to be born, but do not give a crap to what happens to the child once it is here. If people did at hand would not be over 2 million kids in foster care. People would not constantly complain about their taxes going to wic and other social serives programs that are aimed to poor mothers.
Have you ever been raped? Have you ever had that rape result in a pregnancy? How would you be aware of? Would you be able to carry that baby to possession?
That's not a fun situation to be in. Certainly not a healthy one. Who are you to demand that that rape subject suffer another 9 months on top of what she's already been through?
A friend of mine was raped final year by an acquaintance. A little over a month later, she realized she be pregnant. Considering she was practicing abstinence at the moment, after going through a terribly messy divorce next to her abusive ex-husband, there was beyond a shadow of a doubt as to who the baby belonged to.
Are you telling me that, after having be beaten by her husband, stalked and harassed by him, and finally being competent to break free from him, she should then prepare for another 9 months of hell, on top of what she already suffered by the rape?
I don't believe that abortion should be used as a form of lazy birth control. I do believe, that within are at times, extenuating circumstances that mean tough decisions are called for.
I've never be pro-abortion. But I am pro-choice. I went with her to the clinic. How could I not? After all she have been through, the abuse, the terror, the stalking, the harassing, and the icing on the cake... the rape, within is no way I could stand there and judge her for what she needed to do.
I would hope that you'd enjoy a heart and not do so either.
Edit: No. I didn't miss the point, and I didn't assume. I asked questions that you choose not to answer. I didn't expect that you would. Those are very personal question. I answered your question and explained my reasoning behind it. It's quite simple. I am pro-choice, though I am not pro-abortion. I used to be anti-abortion. But how could I look at her, and communicate her I thought it was best for all involved for her to have that child? Especially, when she have opened my eyes to a circumstance I'd never considered, and there was no opening I could pretend to believe that that would be best for her? What used to be such a cut and dry issue for me, no longer is. I still can't think about abortion without seeing her facade the night she came to me. She made the right choice for her. Whether or not that would have be the right choice for me, in that situation, I can't say. I've never been within that situation. I can't judge her.
In my own situation, I found myself pregnant at 21, due to my own stupidity. I made a stupid choice to not be "safe" and abortion was not an option for me. I figure, my mistake, I'll own up to. My son will turn 13 next week. I don't regret my decision. That was my situation, and my choice.
My friend made matching choice when she was preg at 17. Her son is a sweety, turning 14 this year.
What you have to understand, is in that is more than just a uterus, or a fetus at stake here. Those aren't the only things affected by this judgment. Should that child have been born? If so, should she raise it so that she can look at that child every light of day and relive what happened to her? Or should she give it up for adoption? How would she explain that to the child she already has? How would she explain it 20 yrs down the road when that child have grown and come for answers?
I was trying to answer but it get deleted before I posted but here was my answer.
Personally I dream up the choice to have an abortion is a selfish one. The whole "it's my body" argument is only just selfish to me. It's not all about the pregnant woman, what more or less the life growing inside, what about the father?
I think it's insensitive and find it interesting that many woman who are pro-choice are also the same women who would be all over a man for not taking on his responsibilities as a father and equal parent but at indistinguishable time they wouldn't want him to be able to have an equal say surrounded by whether the baby is aborted or not. They think it's of late the women's choice. It's like they want the father involved but only if it's convenient for them.
I think pro-life pro-choice really have a lot to do with when you believe life begin. For me I believe it begins at conception because unless there is a natural miscarriage, it WILL grow into a living human anyone. So to me by stopping that from happening no matter when during the pregnancy you do, it is like massacre a life.
The ONLY time I can understand someone having an abortion is when at hand is a high risk to the mother's life, especially if she already has children who involve her. If someone has a known condition that would complicate a pregnancy and risk their life afterwards they should be responsible for preventing a pregnancy though.
Answers: This is slightly off the topic of what you be asking, but it's what bugs me the most about the whole "pro-choice" thing. Why is that choice merely given to the mother? Does the father get a say in the toddler that is half his genetics? I hold never understood why the mother gets all or the final ruling just because she goes through the pregnancy- it's nine months compared to a whole duration. What choice does the baby have? Yes people hold different ideas of when life begins, but even if you merely see it as a potential life- why is that life not important enough to present it the chance to live. As to your question- I think they do that to keep it impersonal because it's easier to judge of it as a non-thing than a living, human being. Just like they use the terminology "pro-choice" because it's not nice to focus of it as "pro-death of a baby I find inconvenient".
I agree near you.
The main argument that pro-choicers give is "It's her body, it's her choice". Well what about the child. Don't they win a choice? They are the ones who are going to die when it's all said and done. The mother is going to leave that office and know how to go back to her life. The toddler won't.
Who knows who that baby would have grown up to be? They could enjoy done amazing things. But we'll never know.
I do notice how alot of pro-choicers focus on the issue of 'choice' and 'womens body' they rarely ever refer to it as 'discontinuing the duration of a baby' or 'the baby' at all, instead it's an 'embryo' I suppose it's easier to justify the act individual done.
it's similar to 'collateral damage' referring to innocent life taken by war
I agree with you 100% It is really disappointed that a lot of people ("pro-choice") consider a fetus to be a "lump of cells" rather than a developing child.
Nobody is implying that it is only the uterus effected. Her uterus is contained by her body, the baby is being sustained by body alone. That is her business what she chooses to do with her body. If she have a tumor, it is her choice to do what deems necessary to her. Should we give tumors the right to thrive? Nobody should consistency like they no options when faced next to a crisis. It is her body, it belongs to no one else but her. Whatever is in her body, is taken care of as she see fit. If a woman feels the need to terminate a pregnancy, it is not my place to conciliator. I am very much Pro-Choice, but I don't feel abortion is right for me personally.
Personally I do NOT agree with abortion. From the time the sperm meet the egg there is a life growing inside of you. I think too tons women use abortion as a form of birth control and that is just plain SICK!! If it was up to me I would sort it illegal except in extreme cases ie. rape, incest, etc. I believe in the "you play you pay". That if you are grown plenty to have sex you are old enough to switch any consequences that come from it.
However, I have had friends who have have abortions and I have come to realize that it is each person's right to choose. I think it should NOT be allowed after the first 6 weeks, because by next there is a heart beating and a brain forming and to me that is murder.
Related Questions: