Is this wrong?
am asking if this is morally wrong. forget the law. I understand womens right but what about the baby's rights?
Do you reckon that its right after a women has an abortion, but that abortion fails and she delivers the tot alive, that it is still legal to finish the abortion by strangling, suffication or leaving the baby near to die. Is that murder or not?
if it is wrong whats the difference between that an preborth abortion. The baby is still a living human being it just hasn't grown a obverse yet right?
everyone who's answering.. if you care you would report her for her to get reviewed Source(s): this is so wrong within so many levels
Sorry I don't have the heart to watch it, I can't deal near it right now. I just lost a baby prematurely surrounded by May, so that would be too much, but that is what they do in North Korea, if the baby is not pure-bred Korean, and it is mixed near Chinese, because a Korean lady was caught by the guards at the border of China and brought back to the elected representatives, they will do an abortion, and if the baby is born alive, they will step on it, break their necks, or just confer on it to die. It's called infantcide, and North Korea is notorious for it, they do it on a daily font. And this is WRONG!
omg, I just dont have anything to say to this, but I do want to know, please say-so that that has never happened, I just obligation to know that.
Your interrogate is ridiculous. If an abortion does not work then you are commiting murder of an alive human being - one born outside the womb. I do not believe in abortion after 16weeks but after it is born afterwards why not give the baby up for adoption.
Once a woman has a toddler it is completely beyond me that someone with a heart could not do the best by that baby - even if that does mean giving it up for adoption.
Once the baby is born it is very much alive! and if someone strangles it and ends this childs life it's considered murder.
If someone really doesn't want the infant the hospital will make sure it goes to a right place where someone will want the child, There are so oodles people that want little infants so it would be pointless to end the baby's life specially after it's be tried for abortion and failed, this might mean this child is simply meant to live! Source(s): Rock The World! ;)
that is definatly murder, even if its a baby, if you suffocated an adult you would be charged beside murder same if you did that to your baby at your house, just because its at a hospital doesnt mean its ok for them to suffocate a kid i mean if you dont want the baby give it up for adoption its already out and living
That is completely wrong. Choking or suffocating a child is still choking or suffocating a baby, especially if they're already alive and breathing.
Its murder plain and simple, I don't even think pro choice people would estimate its not
If you want to get rid of the baby and it's born, just dispense it up for adoption...
At 8 weeks the baby undeniably looks close to a baby (face and all).
At 21 weeks a baby CAN survive outside the womb.
At 24 weeks a baby WILL survive outside the womb.
How is this even a put somebody through the mill?
Of course it is murder, you need help
This is COMPLETELY wrong! That is murder. If you don't want your baby then give it up for adoption, bloodshed it is just sick. I can't believe you would even ask this
WTF kind of cross-question is this? Duh... Of course it's wrong if she or anyone else does that to a baby! Pfft.
ABSOLUTELY NOT! That is cold blooded murder!
I don't believe in either one. But usually abortion is done within the first trimester up to that time it's had time to grow maturely.
That's murder!
D: that's horrible.
No it's not okay!
Everyone who is sane would say that.
No, dont forget the law. If you do anything to a baby that have taken a breath, it is murder.
No, that's not okay, at adjectives. I don't think that anyone would say that it is okay.
that is to say infantacide and yes I feel that it is morally wrong. If the abortion failed then the infant obviously survived so why not give it to a couple who will love that baby and furnish it a good home? U kno? Source(s): 32w1d
Boop. Two points.
Answers: That's a weird, jacked-up question, but I see your point. I come up with that it is no more morally wrong than having an abortion in the first place. Either way, you are slaughter a child.
FOR THE RECORD I AM PRO CHOICE ALL THE WAY.
If we're going to yak about a hypothetical situation lets talk almost a dad that rapes his 15 year old daughter. Sick right? OH but it gets better, she gets pregnant. Do you conjecture that girl should have to carry that baby and pass birth to it? If you do you are a disgusting human being.
I do not believe in late possession abortion. Killing a child after it is born is murder. I would not defend any women that did that. I don't believe that abortion is a form a birth control. I do believe that every women should have a choice when it comes to her own body though because sometimes sh*t happens.
Related Questions:
What are some honest ways to discipline a insubordinate child?
Grounded daughter snuck out?
What do I do do I of late found out I enjoy a 6 month child what do I do?
Do you reckon that its right after a women has an abortion, but that abortion fails and she delivers the tot alive, that it is still legal to finish the abortion by strangling, suffication or leaving the baby near to die. Is that murder or not?
if it is wrong whats the difference between that an preborth abortion. The baby is still a living human being it just hasn't grown a obverse yet right?
everyone who's answering.. if you care you would report her for her to get reviewed Source(s): this is so wrong within so many levels
Sorry I don't have the heart to watch it, I can't deal near it right now. I just lost a baby prematurely surrounded by May, so that would be too much, but that is what they do in North Korea, if the baby is not pure-bred Korean, and it is mixed near Chinese, because a Korean lady was caught by the guards at the border of China and brought back to the elected representatives, they will do an abortion, and if the baby is born alive, they will step on it, break their necks, or just confer on it to die. It's called infantcide, and North Korea is notorious for it, they do it on a daily font. And this is WRONG!
omg, I just dont have anything to say to this, but I do want to know, please say-so that that has never happened, I just obligation to know that.
Your interrogate is ridiculous. If an abortion does not work then you are commiting murder of an alive human being - one born outside the womb. I do not believe in abortion after 16weeks but after it is born afterwards why not give the baby up for adoption.
Once a woman has a toddler it is completely beyond me that someone with a heart could not do the best by that baby - even if that does mean giving it up for adoption.
Once the baby is born it is very much alive! and if someone strangles it and ends this childs life it's considered murder.
If someone really doesn't want the infant the hospital will make sure it goes to a right place where someone will want the child, There are so oodles people that want little infants so it would be pointless to end the baby's life specially after it's be tried for abortion and failed, this might mean this child is simply meant to live! Source(s): Rock The World! ;)
that is definatly murder, even if its a baby, if you suffocated an adult you would be charged beside murder same if you did that to your baby at your house, just because its at a hospital doesnt mean its ok for them to suffocate a kid i mean if you dont want the baby give it up for adoption its already out and living
That is completely wrong. Choking or suffocating a child is still choking or suffocating a baby, especially if they're already alive and breathing.
Its murder plain and simple, I don't even think pro choice people would estimate its not
If you want to get rid of the baby and it's born, just dispense it up for adoption...
At 8 weeks the baby undeniably looks close to a baby (face and all).
At 21 weeks a baby CAN survive outside the womb.
At 24 weeks a baby WILL survive outside the womb.
How is this even a put somebody through the mill?
Of course it is murder, you need help
This is COMPLETELY wrong! That is murder. If you don't want your baby then give it up for adoption, bloodshed it is just sick. I can't believe you would even ask this
WTF kind of cross-question is this? Duh... Of course it's wrong if she or anyone else does that to a baby! Pfft.
ABSOLUTELY NOT! That is cold blooded murder!
I don't believe in either one. But usually abortion is done within the first trimester up to that time it's had time to grow maturely.
That's murder!
D: that's horrible.
No it's not okay!
Everyone who is sane would say that.
No, dont forget the law. If you do anything to a baby that have taken a breath, it is murder.
No, that's not okay, at adjectives. I don't think that anyone would say that it is okay.
that is to say infantacide and yes I feel that it is morally wrong. If the abortion failed then the infant obviously survived so why not give it to a couple who will love that baby and furnish it a good home? U kno? Source(s): 32w1d
Boop. Two points.
Answers: That's a weird, jacked-up question, but I see your point. I come up with that it is no more morally wrong than having an abortion in the first place. Either way, you are slaughter a child.
FOR THE RECORD I AM PRO CHOICE ALL THE WAY.
If we're going to yak about a hypothetical situation lets talk almost a dad that rapes his 15 year old daughter. Sick right? OH but it gets better, she gets pregnant. Do you conjecture that girl should have to carry that baby and pass birth to it? If you do you are a disgusting human being.
I do not believe in late possession abortion. Killing a child after it is born is murder. I would not defend any women that did that. I don't believe that abortion is a form a birth control. I do believe that every women should have a choice when it comes to her own body though because sometimes sh*t happens.
Related Questions: