A unsullied decree for have too several kids and not individual responsible for them?
I have talked to several women who have more than 5 kids and they complain that they don't own enough $$ to pay for their food and stuff. I just wonder why would they want to hang on to having too many children knowing that they need attention and so heaps things. The worst part of all is that they have medicaid since they can't afford the chief expenses. I would like to have more kids but I want them to have love, attention and ample $$ for school and etc. Don't you think these people should be responsible for their medical bills and expenses if they want to own too many kids?? They even say that it is cheaper having kids within this country!!, To me it has been expensive having 2, and my husband have to work HARD . I'm not against having kids, I;m against having them and not being faithful about it.I know a lady that has 11 kids! medicaid rewarded for them all! Seriously don't you think there should be a statute or rule that makes parents have the kids they can afford or at least not too heaps?
I was actually just thinking around how you can change the system to make it more fair. It is a sturdy thing to do because I do believe in helping those less fortunate that requirement help for reasons beyond their control. On the other hand, I go beyond by public aid office often, to get to Walgreens, I monitor as a family of 6 gets out of the brand new Honda Odyssey, and the mom excuses herself from her I-phone to relate her kids to put away their DS systems. Maybe it is just me but I see something terribly wrong with this picture. I see similar situations adjectives the time and I just don't get it. I don't know what the answer is but I do think that in that is too much abuse in the system and there have got to be some better solutions.
I would not take away the system though and I would not limit the number of kids a individual can have either, especially since they would have to abort babies adjectives the time to follow the law.
I agree with Libre.
But I do know which certain groups of people you are chitchat about. People like Octo-mom, and the ones who were already on aid contained by the beginning and keep getting prego so they don't have to hold looking for work. They are working on that "situation" though.
Answers: I feel bad for the kids being born bc they clutch no part in recieving inadaquate care. I abhorrence to cut funds from children who really do need healthcare; I'm just really resentful with the parents who estimate it is okay to irresponsibly continue to bring more children into the world when they themselves JUST do NOT have the means!... Government funding definately should not be abused within this manner... I totally agree =/.
What we should DOOoooo about it o.O? I'm really not sure...
I can't think of a humane passageway to seriously tie those tubes... (metaphorically speaking).
Also... this is difficult-- bc it could be considered as intruding on our rights as Americans to monitor how many kids we should have depending on what we can afford. It would be tricky trying to word a law similar to that correctly-- so the goverenment would not use that opportunity to their advantage in order to lift care of more hidden agendas besides just what the set aspiration was set out to be-- budget how much money is being shelled out to irresponsible parents.
I would be afraid of the government taking even more free will away from it's citizens by funds of propaganda... and the citizens not even being aware of it.
It's just too bad that we hold irresponsible people leeching off government funds when they should be proactive within making their current lives better instead of passing the time by having more kids... meanwhile ignoring their current monetary inadaquacies and making them worst by have more kids @.@!
I somewhat agree with you on this one.
My sister is expecting her fourth this fall. Her and her husband hold financial difficulties, like a lot of other families, but they do not go and get any government help. Well, she gets WIC but no food stamps or housing assistance or anything approaching that.
Anyways, I also do know a lot of people who have closely of kids and depend on that EBT card to live so I know what you mean. I have 2 kids and have be on gov't help before, when I was single beside my son, but I never depended on it or planned on using it forever. Source(s): Mommy of 2
Sure but think about this situation:
Mr & Mrs Smith have 6 lovely children. Mrs Smith is a SAHM and Mr Smith is a business owner and rake in a comfortable 150.000$ a year.
One day he makes a fruitless decision and his business goes down. He now have a new job but is an employee and simply earns 50.000$ a year.
Will the new law you want allow Child services to pick up 3 of the kids they can no longer thought for? Source(s): Of course I knew what you meant! I know a woman who has 5 kids by 5 different men and presently that the youngest is approaching school age and she is so scared to work, she is on the prowl for the next daddy! Disgusting. I aspiration this kind could be made to sign a contract: either pay their own process or agree to have their tubes tied.
Related Questions:
![What should i know up to that time losing my virginity? [i'm 23]?](../pregnancy-image/pregnancy-1881-pregnant-women-is-having-an-ultrasound-.jpg)
What are the likelihood... on yaz and amoxicillin?
Whats wrong next to me could i be pregnant?
How various weeks pregnant and how long would it pocket for a blood oral exam to come put a bet on to see if i be pregnant?
I was actually just thinking around how you can change the system to make it more fair. It is a sturdy thing to do because I do believe in helping those less fortunate that requirement help for reasons beyond their control. On the other hand, I go beyond by public aid office often, to get to Walgreens, I monitor as a family of 6 gets out of the brand new Honda Odyssey, and the mom excuses herself from her I-phone to relate her kids to put away their DS systems. Maybe it is just me but I see something terribly wrong with this picture. I see similar situations adjectives the time and I just don't get it. I don't know what the answer is but I do think that in that is too much abuse in the system and there have got to be some better solutions.
I would not take away the system though and I would not limit the number of kids a individual can have either, especially since they would have to abort babies adjectives the time to follow the law.
I agree with Libre.
But I do know which certain groups of people you are chitchat about. People like Octo-mom, and the ones who were already on aid contained by the beginning and keep getting prego so they don't have to hold looking for work. They are working on that "situation" though.
Answers: I feel bad for the kids being born bc they clutch no part in recieving inadaquate care. I abhorrence to cut funds from children who really do need healthcare; I'm just really resentful with the parents who estimate it is okay to irresponsibly continue to bring more children into the world when they themselves JUST do NOT have the means!... Government funding definately should not be abused within this manner... I totally agree =/.
What we should DOOoooo about it o.O? I'm really not sure...
I can't think of a humane passageway to seriously tie those tubes... (metaphorically speaking).
Also... this is difficult-- bc it could be considered as intruding on our rights as Americans to monitor how many kids we should have depending on what we can afford. It would be tricky trying to word a law similar to that correctly-- so the goverenment would not use that opportunity to their advantage in order to lift care of more hidden agendas besides just what the set aspiration was set out to be-- budget how much money is being shelled out to irresponsible parents.
I would be afraid of the government taking even more free will away from it's citizens by funds of propaganda... and the citizens not even being aware of it.
It's just too bad that we hold irresponsible people leeching off government funds when they should be proactive within making their current lives better instead of passing the time by having more kids... meanwhile ignoring their current monetary inadaquacies and making them worst by have more kids @.@!
I somewhat agree with you on this one.
My sister is expecting her fourth this fall. Her and her husband hold financial difficulties, like a lot of other families, but they do not go and get any government help. Well, she gets WIC but no food stamps or housing assistance or anything approaching that.
Anyways, I also do know a lot of people who have closely of kids and depend on that EBT card to live so I know what you mean. I have 2 kids and have be on gov't help before, when I was single beside my son, but I never depended on it or planned on using it forever. Source(s): Mommy of 2
Sure but think about this situation:
Mr & Mrs Smith have 6 lovely children. Mrs Smith is a SAHM and Mr Smith is a business owner and rake in a comfortable 150.000$ a year.
One day he makes a fruitless decision and his business goes down. He now have a new job but is an employee and simply earns 50.000$ a year.
Will the new law you want allow Child services to pick up 3 of the kids they can no longer thought for? Source(s): Of course I knew what you meant! I know a woman who has 5 kids by 5 different men and presently that the youngest is approaching school age and she is so scared to work, she is on the prowl for the next daddy! Disgusting. I aspiration this kind could be made to sign a contract: either pay their own process or agree to have their tubes tied.
Related Questions: