Am I the simply one who think here is a possibility...?
that a lot of the posters on this venue are actually adoption agency shills, NCFA supporters and the like; if truth be told compensated for posting here? As has been pointed out, a poster on here is totally anonymous, and can be whomever they choose to present themselves as. I find some of the responders to be suspiciously compassionless in their responses to the mothers and the adopt adults whose experience differs from the conventional, industry-approved message. And, they seem to do their level best to shut up those who don't agree with them. Just curious as to what others conjecture about this.
I agree with you and enjoy thought so for some time. It's almost as if some posters are more invested in the idea of marginalizing different opinions, experiences or point of estimation than concerned about ethics in adoption.
And your point? Does it business? Why is it any different for them to come answer questions here than for those with an anti-adoption agenda?
Would you prefer this forum to be completely one sided? I suspect you would.
This forum is supposed to be a question/answer forum, not a anti-adoption support group, or a pro-adoption support group.
If someone asks a question just about any aspect of adoption, why is it so wrong to hear ALL sides?
If you don't agree with someone's answer so be it, it doesn't necessarily make that answer wrong.
Yup.
Why else would such "happy" people be so compassionless and heartless? Source(s): Surprisingly self actualized full-size adoptee
I don't believe that 911 be an inside job. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I don't believe that space aliens kidnapped Hoffa and I don't believe that Y/Answers is so critical that NCFA has to reward people to post on here.
I think that people are expert of doing their own research and making their own decisions about controversial subjects (including, but not limited to, adoption). Those conclusions may be at variance than what you think they should be, but it is suspiciously egocentric to assume that anyone who disagrees with you MUST own been paid off! Source(s): Doesn't buy conspiracy theories.
No, you're not the only one who think there's a possibility.
Without a doubt. They stalk adoptees' blogs too. I find it kind of creepy actually.
Gosh darnit Sly, don't you know these adopt people grow up to have a voice (sarcasm) they're ruining adoption and must be silenced at all costs, smaller quantity their inventory of fresh infants (aka cash income) takes a downturn LOL
We've already proven that with Diana/Michelle. All one have to do is google their email addy they post, and it usually leads to page after page of baby trolling, which leads to an adoption agency.
Although I discern there are a few misguided adoptees & ap's here, for the most part we all want indistinguishable things- for adoptions to be rare, ethical, and open when possible.
The psycho ones are usually agency shills. They're here and especially contained by the pregnancy section. Fresh new baby=fresh new money. Source(s): google it.
Not doubt almost it!! Sometimes the litany that they spew is an exact match for advertising on their WEB sites.
There are also adoptive parents who pimp for their adoption agencies and jump on every woman who posts around an unplanned pregnancy.
They also stalk blogs.
I dream up there are a LOT of people posing here.
I think that some "Professionals" Post adjectives kinds of questions, from "Great" experiences to Pregnant teens in inevitability of help, possibly looking for PAPs. If I had to guess, they are doing it on their down time as filler, and not forced to do it as part of a regular diary.
I don't think there is a whole lot for them to gain save for feeling warm and fuzzy. Y/A adoption is not THAT busy so I doubt they will waist their time in hopes of a financial gain, who ever does things resembling that are looking for emotional gain.
Quick! Break out the tin-foil hats!
Yes, people are posers on the internet. Some are genuine and some are not. For adjectives we know, you are a Russian spy, sent here to watch.
yes, I think so too.
Especially when they tell adopted culture that there are all those happy adopt people out there who don't miss anything, and when they tell pregnant women that it will gain 'easier" after they surrender their infants.
Agency bs!!
Absolutely without the least doubt in my mind they are on this site and several others just to hear what we have to say and try and coerce
some babyish girl to give up her baby
No you are not the only one who thinks this.I sure do.
Way too many 'answers' that nouns like pure adoption propaganda the same that one can read at many of the adoption agency websites...not the lowest to mention what one can read at the NCFA's website.
And then of course...you have your average Jane & Joe Shmoe's (teen one's too) who literally own no clue about adoption...and simply parrot the 'idea' that giving away one's kid.is just the O! so right entity to do...and yet say they would never do it themselves.
Well...if giving one's baby/kid away is the O! so loving and selfless entity to do...why isn't EVERYONE giving their kids away (including adoptive parents)? Isn't it selfish and unloving to want to keep your children? Come On...folks...let's be all that we can be for our children...bequeath them all away to a 'better' home...and then that 'better' home has to pass them away too. One giant Musical Chair Game! O! what fun!
I totally agree with you!
Answers: I think there are adoption agencies posting stuff within here as well as eager potential adopted parents. I once received an email thank me for considering them for adoption which I wasn't.
If they can convince just one girl to relinquish then there is that extra income contained by there pocket. Women that post here are confused and often do not wish to relinquish but have a feeling like that is there single chose because they are unaware of community programs set in place to help them support their babe-in-arms.
Or they are made to feel bad about using welfare as a channel to support their child for a few years when we all know that adoptive parents get the welfare in language of tax credits and some adoptive parents can't even afford the basics for the baby or the adoption fees and hold to have others pay for them.
No you are not the only one that believes that. I to believe that.
Nope your not the only one. I'm betting nearby are many from many different areas in the "happy" adoption world going from one forum to another to do adjectives the can to disregard and silence those who have actually been near, experienced it, and suffered the loss adoption brings.
I know for a fact one of the agencies here where I live "counsels" first/natural mothers to go out and share their positive story of lately how great adoption was for them and their child. They dish it out as part of their "healing" process. A way for them to verbs and feel good and not grieve the tremendous loss they have experienced. It's freshly another way for them to use these women to profit from, get them to feed the "right" message while believing it will spawn you feel better somehow.
ETA: It baffles me to see a "so what" attitude toward advocating for a mother and child to be seperated for energy for another's personal or financial gain. It still amazes me how many think this is okay in any bearing shape or form.
Definitely don't think you are alone!!
Related Questions:
Can someone who be adopt answer this examine?
If you are wanting to adopt a child?
What is the Problem People own beside Madonna and Angelina Jolie Adopting children surrounded by Africa?
I agree with you and enjoy thought so for some time. It's almost as if some posters are more invested in the idea of marginalizing different opinions, experiences or point of estimation than concerned about ethics in adoption.
And your point? Does it business? Why is it any different for them to come answer questions here than for those with an anti-adoption agenda?
Would you prefer this forum to be completely one sided? I suspect you would.
This forum is supposed to be a question/answer forum, not a anti-adoption support group, or a pro-adoption support group.
If someone asks a question just about any aspect of adoption, why is it so wrong to hear ALL sides?
If you don't agree with someone's answer so be it, it doesn't necessarily make that answer wrong.
Yup.
Why else would such "happy" people be so compassionless and heartless? Source(s): Surprisingly self actualized full-size adoptee
I don't believe that 911 be an inside job. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I don't believe that space aliens kidnapped Hoffa and I don't believe that Y/Answers is so critical that NCFA has to reward people to post on here.
I think that people are expert of doing their own research and making their own decisions about controversial subjects (including, but not limited to, adoption). Those conclusions may be at variance than what you think they should be, but it is suspiciously egocentric to assume that anyone who disagrees with you MUST own been paid off! Source(s): Doesn't buy conspiracy theories.
No, you're not the only one who think there's a possibility.
Without a doubt. They stalk adoptees' blogs too. I find it kind of creepy actually.
Gosh darnit Sly, don't you know these adopt people grow up to have a voice (sarcasm) they're ruining adoption and must be silenced at all costs, smaller quantity their inventory of fresh infants (aka cash income) takes a downturn LOL
We've already proven that with Diana/Michelle. All one have to do is google their email addy they post, and it usually leads to page after page of baby trolling, which leads to an adoption agency.
Although I discern there are a few misguided adoptees & ap's here, for the most part we all want indistinguishable things- for adoptions to be rare, ethical, and open when possible.
The psycho ones are usually agency shills. They're here and especially contained by the pregnancy section. Fresh new baby=fresh new money. Source(s): google it.
Not doubt almost it!! Sometimes the litany that they spew is an exact match for advertising on their WEB sites.
There are also adoptive parents who pimp for their adoption agencies and jump on every woman who posts around an unplanned pregnancy.
They also stalk blogs.
I dream up there are a LOT of people posing here.
I think that some "Professionals" Post adjectives kinds of questions, from "Great" experiences to Pregnant teens in inevitability of help, possibly looking for PAPs. If I had to guess, they are doing it on their down time as filler, and not forced to do it as part of a regular diary.
I don't think there is a whole lot for them to gain save for feeling warm and fuzzy. Y/A adoption is not THAT busy so I doubt they will waist their time in hopes of a financial gain, who ever does things resembling that are looking for emotional gain.
Quick! Break out the tin-foil hats!
Yes, people are posers on the internet. Some are genuine and some are not. For adjectives we know, you are a Russian spy, sent here to watch.
yes, I think so too.
Especially when they tell adopted culture that there are all those happy adopt people out there who don't miss anything, and when they tell pregnant women that it will gain 'easier" after they surrender their infants.
Agency bs!!
Absolutely without the least doubt in my mind they are on this site and several others just to hear what we have to say and try and coerce
some babyish girl to give up her baby
No you are not the only one who thinks this.I sure do.
Way too many 'answers' that nouns like pure adoption propaganda the same that one can read at many of the adoption agency websites...not the lowest to mention what one can read at the NCFA's website.
And then of course...you have your average Jane & Joe Shmoe's (teen one's too) who literally own no clue about adoption...and simply parrot the 'idea' that giving away one's kid.is just the O! so right entity to do...and yet say they would never do it themselves.
Well...if giving one's baby/kid away is the O! so loving and selfless entity to do...why isn't EVERYONE giving their kids away (including adoptive parents)? Isn't it selfish and unloving to want to keep your children? Come On...folks...let's be all that we can be for our children...bequeath them all away to a 'better' home...and then that 'better' home has to pass them away too. One giant Musical Chair Game! O! what fun!
I totally agree with you!
Answers: I think there are adoption agencies posting stuff within here as well as eager potential adopted parents. I once received an email thank me for considering them for adoption which I wasn't.
If they can convince just one girl to relinquish then there is that extra income contained by there pocket. Women that post here are confused and often do not wish to relinquish but have a feeling like that is there single chose because they are unaware of community programs set in place to help them support their babe-in-arms.
Or they are made to feel bad about using welfare as a channel to support their child for a few years when we all know that adoptive parents get the welfare in language of tax credits and some adoptive parents can't even afford the basics for the baby or the adoption fees and hold to have others pay for them.
No you are not the only one that believes that. I to believe that.
Nope your not the only one. I'm betting nearby are many from many different areas in the "happy" adoption world going from one forum to another to do adjectives the can to disregard and silence those who have actually been near, experienced it, and suffered the loss adoption brings.
I know for a fact one of the agencies here where I live "counsels" first/natural mothers to go out and share their positive story of lately how great adoption was for them and their child. They dish it out as part of their "healing" process. A way for them to verbs and feel good and not grieve the tremendous loss they have experienced. It's freshly another way for them to use these women to profit from, get them to feed the "right" message while believing it will spawn you feel better somehow.
ETA: It baffles me to see a "so what" attitude toward advocating for a mother and child to be seperated for energy for another's personal or financial gain. It still amazes me how many think this is okay in any bearing shape or form.
Definitely don't think you are alone!!
Related Questions: