Since relinquishment of newborn babies are low...?
and their has been an increase in foster children, would you influence that there are corrupted social workers trying to find infants and toddlers to place for adoption through the foster care so there friends can adopt or do you believe that mishandle and neglect have gone up since forced relinquishment has gone down?
If you hold links to prove what you are saying please post.
I think that too lots unwed young girls think it is totally acceptable and fun to catch pregnant, then when the baby comes and reality sets surrounded by, they no longer think it is fun. The expense of the baby plus 24/7 care, not anyone able to go to parties and own fun for these immature kids that either do not even know who the father is or else he is only as irresponsible just makes for a lot of unwanted children. I also suggest that the parents of these kids that get pregnant or get a girl pregnant should be heavily penalized and fined for not lessons their children better and not keeping a close watch on them. Don't try to blame the social workers for the fact there are too lots kids in foster. That is like blaming the dogcatcher for so many stray dogs and cats!
I don't enjoy links to post, but in the foster care training classes I attended, the increase of children in foster contemplation has been blamed on a number of different factor:
1. Lower societal thresholds for what constitutes abuse. Barely 25 or 30 years ago, many considered what happened inside the home to be private and above reproach. A man's home be his castle and he could rule it however he saw fit.
2. Higher rates of reporting abuse. This is linked to the first reason, but not exactly indistinguishable. Sexual abuse in particular have been severely under-reported in the past (and still is according to several experts). If a child was sexually abused, either the family and friends denied it happen or tried to cover it up because many feared it would reflect defectively on the child. Now neighbors and friends are more likely to report suspected sexual abuse because some of the stigma has be removed from the victim.
3. Meth. At least in my community, Meth is a foremost problem that has only surfaced over the last ten to fifeteen years. People on meth are oblivious to the requests of other, including their children. Drug use is indicated in over 90% of DHS cases, and Meth makes up over 75% of those cases. These are statistics for my community, but likely are similar within many communities across the nation.
I don't have a source, as this was given to me as a hand-out at foster guardianship training conducted by The Boys & Girls Society in Oregon.
ETA: I think that the people who work for DHS are human and can cause mistakes just like the rest of us. Although there may be a few who are corrupt or only just incompetent, I think that the majority are trying their best to help children. They are severely overworked and underpaid and are being asked to do their job with a constant shortage of resources. Perhaps if they got more support from society as a whole and smaller quantity critism when things go wrong there would be fewer mistakes.
Answers: I think you're a little confused roughly how children who enter foster care are placed for adoption. Social workers cannot terminate parental rights. That can only begin before a judge. So a "corrupted" social worker could not snatch a child and place him/her for adoption without the agreement of an equally corrupted supervisor and intercede.
I mean, I'm sure it's possible in some cases, but it would be quite the conspiracy. I regard as it's more likely that there are two sides to every story, than that every state employee have some sort of personal vendetta against biological families and crusade for would-be adoptive parents.
Do social workers and judges make mistakes? Sure. Not adjectives kids who are removed and/or TPRed had to be, because the people making the decision are human. It doesn't miserable they're all "corrupted" or doing it on purpose to screw with innocent family.
While I don't think that increasing demand for infants and toddlers is unrelated, and I'm sure contained by some cases has pushed through a termination more quickly, I don't see it as a sole factor. I also think there's within increase in willingness to intervene in other people's family rather than seeing parents as free to do whatever they want with their own kids, and an increase surrounded by mandated reporting. The whole mindset around raising children, and whether population besides the parents have any say in it, have changed completely in the last few generations.
Before a child is TPRed, the state pays for removal, foster watchfulness, the services of social workers and resource workers, visit transport, medical coverage for the child, case plan assistance for the parents, the legal process of rights termination, the trial process of contesting appeals, and in some cases adoptive homestudy and finalization. The state does not make money on adoption. If the state wanted to do what be cheapest, children would not be removed at all.
CPS does make mistakes. I totally agree. But it isn't ALWAYS personal or malicious.
I think the relinquishment's are lower b/c it's not a stigma like it be in the past. (Single and pregnant or teen and pregnant) I do think more are taken because while age childlike or old has nothing to do beside whether you will be a good parent alot of younger mothers get a big slap of reality after the child is born and they realize it's not all fun and games. I DO NOT MEAN ALL! I have 2 friends that were teen moms and be excellent but, I have seen a 21 year old rebuff her child put him in danger etc and have call CPS. --I would have called no matter her age. I would really hope here are not corrupt workers doing that.
Sdsdiu...this is not an free advertising forum knock it off!
I agree next to Traylee---the CPW work very long hours and are very committed to their work as are the caseworkers. for every child removed from an abusive home here is a court appearance within 48 hrs at which point it must be shown that the child was in an offensive home. If the court agrees the child remains in foster care until the next court audible range. At any court hearing the Judge can decide to return the child home.
In my area the increase surrounded by foster care kids is due to meth and stronger drugs. The drug use is out of control and I see no signs that it is slowing down. The intent of the law is that these kids step to a relative home first but in most cases the relatives aren't any better than the parents---if they pass background checks the child is placed near them. And that's good when they can find a relative.
Related Questions:
Jackson- Rowe reversal of TPR and money deal not once but twice?
What i can serve my daughter?r adoption (open adoption)?
Is Korean Adoption still plausible?
If you hold links to prove what you are saying please post.
I think that too lots unwed young girls think it is totally acceptable and fun to catch pregnant, then when the baby comes and reality sets surrounded by, they no longer think it is fun. The expense of the baby plus 24/7 care, not anyone able to go to parties and own fun for these immature kids that either do not even know who the father is or else he is only as irresponsible just makes for a lot of unwanted children. I also suggest that the parents of these kids that get pregnant or get a girl pregnant should be heavily penalized and fined for not lessons their children better and not keeping a close watch on them. Don't try to blame the social workers for the fact there are too lots kids in foster. That is like blaming the dogcatcher for so many stray dogs and cats!
I don't enjoy links to post, but in the foster care training classes I attended, the increase of children in foster contemplation has been blamed on a number of different factor:
1. Lower societal thresholds for what constitutes abuse. Barely 25 or 30 years ago, many considered what happened inside the home to be private and above reproach. A man's home be his castle and he could rule it however he saw fit.
2. Higher rates of reporting abuse. This is linked to the first reason, but not exactly indistinguishable. Sexual abuse in particular have been severely under-reported in the past (and still is according to several experts). If a child was sexually abused, either the family and friends denied it happen or tried to cover it up because many feared it would reflect defectively on the child. Now neighbors and friends are more likely to report suspected sexual abuse because some of the stigma has be removed from the victim.
3. Meth. At least in my community, Meth is a foremost problem that has only surfaced over the last ten to fifeteen years. People on meth are oblivious to the requests of other, including their children. Drug use is indicated in over 90% of DHS cases, and Meth makes up over 75% of those cases. These are statistics for my community, but likely are similar within many communities across the nation.
I don't have a source, as this was given to me as a hand-out at foster guardianship training conducted by The Boys & Girls Society in Oregon.
ETA: I think that the people who work for DHS are human and can cause mistakes just like the rest of us. Although there may be a few who are corrupt or only just incompetent, I think that the majority are trying their best to help children. They are severely overworked and underpaid and are being asked to do their job with a constant shortage of resources. Perhaps if they got more support from society as a whole and smaller quantity critism when things go wrong there would be fewer mistakes.
Answers: I think you're a little confused roughly how children who enter foster care are placed for adoption. Social workers cannot terminate parental rights. That can only begin before a judge. So a "corrupted" social worker could not snatch a child and place him/her for adoption without the agreement of an equally corrupted supervisor and intercede.
I mean, I'm sure it's possible in some cases, but it would be quite the conspiracy. I regard as it's more likely that there are two sides to every story, than that every state employee have some sort of personal vendetta against biological families and crusade for would-be adoptive parents.
Do social workers and judges make mistakes? Sure. Not adjectives kids who are removed and/or TPRed had to be, because the people making the decision are human. It doesn't miserable they're all "corrupted" or doing it on purpose to screw with innocent family.
While I don't think that increasing demand for infants and toddlers is unrelated, and I'm sure contained by some cases has pushed through a termination more quickly, I don't see it as a sole factor. I also think there's within increase in willingness to intervene in other people's family rather than seeing parents as free to do whatever they want with their own kids, and an increase surrounded by mandated reporting. The whole mindset around raising children, and whether population besides the parents have any say in it, have changed completely in the last few generations.
Before a child is TPRed, the state pays for removal, foster watchfulness, the services of social workers and resource workers, visit transport, medical coverage for the child, case plan assistance for the parents, the legal process of rights termination, the trial process of contesting appeals, and in some cases adoptive homestudy and finalization. The state does not make money on adoption. If the state wanted to do what be cheapest, children would not be removed at all.
CPS does make mistakes. I totally agree. But it isn't ALWAYS personal or malicious.
I think the relinquishment's are lower b/c it's not a stigma like it be in the past. (Single and pregnant or teen and pregnant) I do think more are taken because while age childlike or old has nothing to do beside whether you will be a good parent alot of younger mothers get a big slap of reality after the child is born and they realize it's not all fun and games. I DO NOT MEAN ALL! I have 2 friends that were teen moms and be excellent but, I have seen a 21 year old rebuff her child put him in danger etc and have call CPS. --I would have called no matter her age. I would really hope here are not corrupt workers doing that.
Sdsdiu...this is not an free advertising forum knock it off!
I agree next to Traylee---the CPW work very long hours and are very committed to their work as are the caseworkers. for every child removed from an abusive home here is a court appearance within 48 hrs at which point it must be shown that the child was in an offensive home. If the court agrees the child remains in foster care until the next court audible range. At any court hearing the Judge can decide to return the child home.
In my area the increase surrounded by foster care kids is due to meth and stronger drugs. The drug use is out of control and I see no signs that it is slowing down. The intent of the law is that these kids step to a relative home first but in most cases the relatives aren't any better than the parents---if they pass background checks the child is placed near them. And that's good when they can find a relative.
Related Questions: