Adoptees would you be furious if you found out your mom's relinquished you because they didn't enjoy any money?

and your adopters could have given your parents money so they could have raised you?
Why would I be furious if my birth mom placed me because she did not enjoy money? And why would my adoptive parents give money to my birth mom so she could raise me? That is ridiculous. If I was a birth mom I would not expect another couple to wage me to keep my child, that is ridiculous.
Nope. I wouldn't be furious in any way. I enjoy no idea why I was given for adoption but since I can't change days gone by (either theirs or mine) I don't sweat what didn't happen. Do I believe, as you obviously do, that my parents or any other adoptive parents have any direct or indirect moral or physical obligation to give (my) birth parent(s) money? No, I couldn't buy that argument the other 20 times you asked the question and I still can't buy that argument presently. People need to take responsibility for their own situations and if they can't or they are unable to for what ever idea then there are plenty of programs available to assist them. We have it too biddable in North America and we can't always have everything hand to us on a silver platter.
No. Source(s): Surprisingly self actualized adult adoptee
No my parents were of no constraint to financial support my birthmother. My birth mother couldn’t hold down a job and spent time living on the street. Certainly money was one reason she didn’t hold me but it wasn’t the only reason. However it wasn’t my parents or anyone else to support her financially. She was an fully developed who already had one child(3 years older then me) so she should hold gotten her **** together long before I was even born.

If she gave me up newly because of money even then I wouldn’t be furious. I know some adoptees have said they’d stayed with the instinctive mother even if it meant they had to live on the street or grow up in some homeless shelter, live surrounded by a run down apartment with no heat or running water. Well I am not one of those adoptees.
No, money or not and being a baby at the time of relinquishment, if I had the choice, I probably wouldn't of needed to be raised by a baby.
You think surrounded by black and white, according to you babies are given up strictly due to a lack of money?! Was this your situation, and if it is your situation it must be everyone else's as well?
No, my biological mother was on a sickness benifit. She still is. She would not enjoy been able to look after me. However, my granddad is rich so I am a little barmy that he didn't help or even take me in but that's another issue.
Answers:    No.

Get Real you really necessitate to get "REAL".
NO!
If my mom couldn't lift afford me then she did the best thing she could do. give me to a family circle who could. If she didn't have money she shouldnt be getting prego
anyone who would give you money to raise a children, wishes therapy.
Nope.

And seriously, you need to find something unmarked to rant about. This one is getting --old--
No.
Get Real you need to pace yourself. You're askin so various questions today you're gonna run out of points!
Is something wrong with you?
Are you broken?

And no. Gah.
No, I'd be more furious that my mother give me up over something like money and didn't work harder and figure out a plan to keep me.

Related Questions:
Any thoughts/ideas going on for adopt a minor elder than bio son?   For Birthmothers, what is your story?   APs if your adoptee's mom considered necessary her kid rear legs and be competent to be a biddable mom would you dispense them fund?   I want to find an adoption agency contained by raleigh, nc.?   If a creature comments on an agency?  
  • Can/Do African American or Latino parents adopt caucasian babies?
  • Would you consider fostering or adopt a child?
  • Based on my avitar picture, do you chew over I could?