Is anyone watching "Flashpoint" on CBS?
yup, adoption is involved...love to hear your thoughts.
IT'S FICTION!
FICTION MEANS IT'S NOT REAL!
The bio-dad had trauma from his own childhood, be a drug user, and not completely sane to begin with.
But, what, he should be allowed to behave the way he is and lift up the kid just because he shot some sperm at the right time?
COME ON!
Shut off your TV, go outside, and come together us in the real world. Mistaking TV for reality isn't sane. Letting a fiction TV show bother you resembling this isn't healthy.
EDIT TO ADD:
It's called "story line".
They aren't "portraying" anything.
They're telling a story.
In this extraordinary story, the bio dad is a whack-a-do with daddy issues. The bio-mom seemed like she be accepting the situation, despite missing her baby. The AP's were delighted beside the child, and were doing what any new parent would. A lot of AP's are wealthy. Most enjoy great houses, A lot of them are older. I don't see the problem!
Let me ask you this...
If it was a true story, should that bio-father be allowed to get away next to that behavior?
Do you think that bio-dad should be allowed to raise the child in the state he's surrounded by?
I didn't see it. I don't really watch TV.
But from what I've read about it, it seem very typical of portrayals of adoption on TV and in movies-- full of stereotypes, and with little consideration or background research about the procedures or experiences of adoption.
I don't think any single episode, show, or movie is potential to have any significant effect on the public's view of adoption. I do think that continual perpetuation of these stereotypes might own a cumulative effect. But it's fiction, and people have the right to produce it.
Answers: Haven't seen it.
Related Questions:
A ask in the region of adoption?
Any fitting search/reunion agencies that do intl search?
Whats the least possible expensive to adopt a child from in a foreign country and bring him to uk ?
IT'S FICTION!
FICTION MEANS IT'S NOT REAL!
The bio-dad had trauma from his own childhood, be a drug user, and not completely sane to begin with.
But, what, he should be allowed to behave the way he is and lift up the kid just because he shot some sperm at the right time?
COME ON!
Shut off your TV, go outside, and come together us in the real world. Mistaking TV for reality isn't sane. Letting a fiction TV show bother you resembling this isn't healthy.
EDIT TO ADD:
It's called "story line".
They aren't "portraying" anything.
They're telling a story.
In this extraordinary story, the bio dad is a whack-a-do with daddy issues. The bio-mom seemed like she be accepting the situation, despite missing her baby. The AP's were delighted beside the child, and were doing what any new parent would. A lot of AP's are wealthy. Most enjoy great houses, A lot of them are older. I don't see the problem!
Let me ask you this...
If it was a true story, should that bio-father be allowed to get away next to that behavior?
Do you think that bio-dad should be allowed to raise the child in the state he's surrounded by?
I didn't see it. I don't really watch TV.
But from what I've read about it, it seem very typical of portrayals of adoption on TV and in movies-- full of stereotypes, and with little consideration or background research about the procedures or experiences of adoption.
I don't think any single episode, show, or movie is potential to have any significant effect on the public's view of adoption. I do think that continual perpetuation of these stereotypes might own a cumulative effect. But it's fiction, and people have the right to produce it.
Answers: Haven't seen it.
Related Questions:
